Pharmacognostical
and Preliminary Phytochemical Studies on the Stem Bark
of Soymida febrifuga (Roxb)
Malarkodi Velraj1*,
Armstrong1, Ravichandran1, Jeyakumari1,
Hemalatha1, Vijayalakshmi1 and Srikanth.J2
Soymida
febrifuga is commonly known as
Shem in Tamil and Indian red wood in English. In Ayurveda
the bark is used as a good cure for ulcer, leprosy and dysentery. In unani the bark is used as an astringent to the bowel and
useful in fever. The bark is also used in vaginal infection, rheumatic
swellings, oedema, wounds, dental problems, uterine
bleeding and malarial fever. There was no report on the pharmacognostic
study of the plant and hence the present investigation deals with the
anatomical, microscopical, powder microscopy, physio-chemical, fluorescence analysis, Thin layer
chromatography and high performance thin layer chromatography. The study
revealed the presence of drugs of calcium oxalate, tannins dilated phloem rays,
sieve elements and schlerids. Phytochemical
studies showed the presence of steroids, terpenoids, flavanoids and tannins.
KEYWORDS: Soymida febrifuga, TLS, RLS
INTRODUCTION:
Soymida
febrifuga (Roxb)
Meliaceae syn Swietemia febrifuga is
a very large tree of 70-80 feet high. Leaves are paripinnate,
leaf lets are 6 pairs, opposite, ovate-oblong, entire, obtuse or retuse. Flowers are greenish-white in auxiliary or terminal
panicles. Sepals-5 imbrigate. Petals-5 clawed.
Stamens-10 in a staminal tube, ovary 5 – locular, ovules numerous per locule,
pendulous, stigma 5 – angled. The bark is refrigerant, anthelmintic,
aphrodisiac, laxative good for sore throat and used in advanced stages of
dysentery and in diarrhea. Bark contains a resinous bitter principle and is a
popular drug in indigenous medicine 1, 2.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
The bark was collected
from Tirupati and authenticated by Dr.K.Madhavachetty Department of botany; Sri Venkateswara university and given the accession number 1312
and a voucher specimen is deposited in the department of Pharmacognosy, Vel’s college of pharmacy. Fresh plants were used for
macroscopic and microscopic studies. The plant parts were fixed in FAA and
dehydrated with graded series of tertiary butyl alcohol. Microtome stem were
stained with toludine blue as per standard method 3.
Powder microscopy was done according to standard procedure 4.
Physiochemical standard were done according to WHO guidelines 5.
Fluorescence analysis was done by standard procedure 6. Histochemical reaction was followed from crom well 7. TLC was followed using standard
procedure from Wagner8.
Quantitative microcopies were followed from Trease
and Evans 9.
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION:
Macroscopic
Features: (fig 1and2)
The older bark is
compact, thick fibrous pieces which are rusty, grey or brown colour externally red on the inner surface. Bark obtained
from young tree is straight or somewhat curved; half tubular quills an inch or
more in diameter and about ½ an inch in thickness. It exhibits furrows or crack
but numerous small corky warts. These form little elliptic scars or rings brown
in centre. The inner side and edges of quills are of a bright reddish brown.
The bark has a fibrous fracture, without any distress odour
but with a bitter astringent taste.
Fig
1:
Pm=Periderm, PeF=periderm flake
Fig
2:
Ph=Phloem, Pe=Periderm
Microscopic
Characters:
The bark is divided
into outer bark and inner bark. Outer bark is the periderm
part of the bark. It is 250μm thick and consists of dark staining outer
part of phellem and a wide light stained Phelloderm (fig.3).
The phellem cells are suberised.
Phelloderm is wider, thin walled and living tissue.
It is 400μm thick and consists of narrow and wide tubular cells which
alternated in radial files.
Fig
3:
Pm=Periderm, Pd=Phellem, CPh=Collapsed Phloem
The inner bark
consists of two regions i.e. outer zone of crushed and collapsed phloem tissue
and inner zone of intact phloem.
The outer collapsed
phloem (fig.4) much dilated with
wavy phloem rays. The rays become further distortered
in the outer region towards the periderm. The sieve
elements are crushed into dark patches. Tannin content and calcium oxalate
crystals are heavily deposited into collapsed phloem. Phloem sclerenchyma are scattered into small masses in this
region.
Fig
4:
CPh=Collapsed Phloem, NCPh=
Non Collapsed Phloem, PhR=Phloem ray
The inner zone of
intact –phloem lies outer to the secondary xylem (fig 5). It is narrow and comprise of intact sieve elements. Phloem
rays are narrow and straight. Small blocks of phloem sclerenchyma
or sclerids are seen in regular tangential bands (fig 6).
Fig
5:CPh=Collapsed
Phloem, PhR=Phloem ray
Fig
6:
PhR=Phloem ray, PhS=Phloem sclereid, SC=Sieve cells
TLS
View of the Bark:
In TLS the ray
serration, ray dimension, their arrangement, structure and dimension of the
sieve tube and phloem parenchyma cells were studied. Medullary
rays are not studied. They are wide semi seriate occasionally biseriate comprising one type of cells which are squarish or rectangular in shape. These rays are
220-700μm high and 20 - 100μm wide.
The sieve tube numbers
are narrow and short. They are 300-320μm in height and 30-40 μm in width. The sieve plate is simple and oblique.
The companion cells are narrow and occur in vertical row of many cells (fig 7).
Fig
7:
PhP=Phloem parenchyma, PhR=phloem
ray, ST=Sieve tube
RLS
View of the Bark:
In RLS view the phloem
rays are seen in horizontal wide bands consisting of rectangular cells. Phloem sclerenchyma occurs in vertical parallel pillars (fig 6). The periderm
consists of wide bands of radially arranged
rectangular narrow and wide Phelloderm cells (fig 8).
Fig
8:
Cr=Crystals, PhS=Phloem sclereid,
PhR=Phloem ray
Calcium oxalate
crystals are abundant in the collapsed phloem tissue. There are two types of
crystals seen in the phloem (fig 9).
Druses and prismatic crystals are equally abundant. The crystals occur mostly
in the phloem parenchyma cells. The crystals are large and each crystal
occupies the entire lumen of the cell. When seen in LS view the crystals are
vertical continuous strands (fig 10).
Prismatic crystals are mostly associated with the sclerid
masses. The prismatic crystals are up to 50μ thick and druses are
40μm thick.
Fig
9:
Scl=Sclerids, Dr=Druses,
PC=Prismatic crystals
Fig
10:
Dr=Druses, PC=Prismatic crystals
Powder
Microscopy:
The powder of the bark
is reddish in colour with aromatic odour. The taste is bitter and the texture is coarse.
These fibre sclerids cells are fibre like and elongated with tapering ends. But their
walls and pits are like sclerids. The walls are thick
with wide lumens and pits are canal like and simple. The cells are narrow or
wide and are about 950μm long and 30-40 μm
thick. When the sclerids are seen under the polarized
light microscope they appear bright indicating that the walls are lignified (fig 11and12).
Fig
11: FSc= Fibre
sclereids
Fig
11: FSc= Fibre
sclereids
Transverse section of
the bark was treated with routine chemicals and results are tabulated. It gave
positive test for steroids, tannins, terpenoids and flavonoids and results are tabulated in Table no: 1
|
Table No 1:Chemical
Tests of the transverse section of the bark |
|||
|
S.No |
Reaction |
Colour Observation |
Inference |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Section
placed in weak iodine solution Section
placed in 10% FeCl3 and a little of Na2CO3 Section
placed in Dragendroffs reagent Section
placed in a drop of 5% aqueous KOH solution Section
placed in caustic alkali and HCl Section
placed in a drop of H2SO4 |
Absence
of bluish patches Bluish
colour appeared Presence
of orange colour A
strong yellow colour appeared. Yellowish
patches appeared. No
yellow or red colour appeared. |
Absence
of starch Presence
of tannins Presence
of alkaloids Presence
of flavonoids Presence
of calcium oxalate Absence
of saponins or lipids |
The fluorescence
analysis was observed in day light and UV light at 254nm using various solvents
and tabulated below for the crude powder in Table no: 2.
|
Table No 2: Fluorescence analysis of powder stems
bark of Soymida febrifuga. |
||
|
Material or
treatment |
Colour in day light |
Observation under UV
light |
|
Drug
powder + 1N HCl Drug
powder + 50% HCl Drug
powder + 50% H2SO4 Drug
powder + 50% HNO3 Drug
powder + 1N NaOH Drug
powder + 1N NaOH Drug
powder + Al.NaOH Drug
powder + water |
Brown Brown Brown Brown Red Red Reddish
brown Brown |
Green Green Green Green Black Black Black Green |
Physiochemical
Standards:
The physiochemical
standards studies like ash value, extractive value were carried out and
observations are recorded in Table no:
3.
|
Table
No 3: physiochemical standards |
||
|
S.No |
Parameters |
Result |
|
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. |
Total ash Acid insoluble ash Water soluble ash Extractive value Alcohol soluble
extract Water soluble
extract |
9%w/w 3%w/w 0.7%w/w 3.5%w/v 5.8%w/v 4.2%w/v |
Preliminary
Phytochemical Analysis:
The Preliminary phytochemical analysis of the stem bark of Soymida febrifuga is
tabulated in Table No: 4.
|
Table
No 4: Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis |
||
|
Test |
Extracts |
|
|
Aqueous |
Ethanol |
|
|
Alkaloids |
+ |
+ |
|
Carbohydrates |
+ |
+ |
|
Glycosides |
- |
- |
|
Sugar |
- |
- |
|
Steroids |
- |
+ |
|
Saponins |
+ |
- |
|
Tannins |
+ |
+ |
|
Phenolic
compounds |
- |
- |
|
Proteins |
- |
- |
|
Terpenoids |
+ |
+ |
|
Flavanoids |
+ |
+ |
|
Anthocyanin |
- |
- |
|
Quinones |
- |
- |
Thin
Layer Chromatography:
TLC of the ethanolic extract was developed in n butanol:
acetic acid: water (4:1:5) which showed 1 spot at an Rf
value of 0.8928 and with chloroform: methanol (10:1) showed one spot at an Rf value 0.434. HPTLC finger print profile of ethanol
extract showed 8 spots with an Rf value of 0.16,
0.25, 0.48, 0.51, 0.60, 0.77, 0.84 and 0.90 at 5μl. At 10 ml it showed 7
spots with an Rf value of 0.16, 0.26, 0.46, 0.59,
0.76, 0.84, 0.90.
CONCLUSION:
The present data
generated would help in the authentication of the drug both in dry and powder
form. The macroscopic, microscopic characters and the quantitative standards
would be useful for ranging down pharmacopoeial
standards. The different spots observed in TLC and HPTLC finger print profile
will be definitely useful for deciding the purity, quality of the drug to lay
down standard.
REFERENCE:
1.
The wealth of
4.
Kokate CK.
Practical pharmacognosy, Vallabh prakashan,
New Delhi.1999.
5.
Cromwell, BT. Modern Methods of Plant
Analysis,
6.
7.
Wagner H, Bladt SZalinski EM. Plant drug analysis (a thin layer
chromatography) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Newyork. 1984.
8.
Trease GE, Evans
WC. Pharmacognosy. Baillière Tindall,
Received on
25.09.2009
Accepted on
15.10.2009
© A&V
Publication all right reserved
Research
Journal of Pharmacognosy and
Phytochemistry. 1(3): Nov.-Dec.. 2009, 213-216